Challenge
A strategically important seaport—central to the movement of autos, refrigerated produce, fertilizer, and project cargo—plays a significant role in the U.S. logistics chain. Despite a compact physical footprint, it handles millions of tons of freight annually and shares a perimeter with a military installation, requiring elevated levels of security, coordination, and operational precision.
As the port’s responsibilities have grown in scope and complexity, so too has the need for more advanced video intelligence. While the port had invested in a large, diverse network of IP cameras, increasing demand for real-time situational awareness, regulatory compliance, and operational agility made it clear that a more scalable, intelligent layer of analysis was needed—one that could work with its current infrastructure.
As with many ports balancing safety, throughput, and compliance, existing motion-based video systems were generating excessive alerts without enough actionable insights. Teams faced growing demands for real-time incident detection, environmental monitoring, and perimeter awareness—but with the ability to prioritize threats and efficiently review actionable alerts. At the same time, new mandates from agencies such as the California Air Resources Board (CARB) introduced additional compliance and documentation requirements.
The port sought a forward-looking solution that could:
- Work seamlessly with its diverse IP camera network.
- Reduce alert fatigue by filtering out false positives.
- Improve detection and response across security and environmental use cases.
- Scale efficiently to support future AI-powered operations and compliance needs.
Impact
As external demands grew—from federal safety guidelines to CARB's 2025 rules—the limitations of the port’s video capabilities became increasingly clear. To maintain high standards of safety and responsiveness, a better approach to video monitoring was needed.
- Security teams were spending too much time reviewing routine motion alerts.
- Verification of real incidents was slowed by manual camera review.
- Real-time documentation of emissions events—needed for compliance—was not possible.
- Operational stakeholders wanted more visibility into crane, yard, and perimeter activity.
By enhancing their existing infrastructure rather than replacing it, port leaders saw an opportunity to increase visibility, boost compliance readiness, and streamline security workflows without incurring significant capital costs or disrupting daily operations.
-3.png?width=137&height=26&name=Untitled%20design%20(1)-3.png){kind=small}
.png?width=60&height=40&name=Untitled%20design%20(75).png){kind=small}
Vaidio | Datastew
.png?width=50&height=33&name=Untitled%20design%20(77).png){kind=small}